BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


A short story which may be well worth your time and energy.

 
  

Page: 123(4)5

 
 
A Haus of Minions
01:05 / 11.01.06
Anyway... critique.

Bodies writhed with reckless abandon.


Good start. Punchy, sets up an interesting scenario, starts with action, I am drawn in.


Sour, tangy sweat drenched glistening bodies about the room, which was filled with acrid Gunga smoke and rough, lusty shouts and whimpers.

Ok, fills in the scene a bit, moves from visual to non-visual, good good.

Although... can anyone see something starting here? How many adjectives are there in relation to nouns in this sentence? Lots. Many nouns get two adjectives. Not adjectives actually doing anything much, just description piled on description. The bodies (or possibly the sweat – the grammar is confused) are sour and tangy. The shouts and whimpers are rough and lusty. It's a tendency of the young and florid to overegg with empty adjectival calories – it pads out a story and gives a feeling of versatility, but the time and space could usually be better spent showing rather than telling.

The sentence structure is getting a bit confused as well, which may turn off the reader. How do you drench glistening bodies about the room? Where a descriptive term is actually needed – scattered, say – it is missing.


The smell of Ultimate Vice and Ultimate Abandonment of Redemption permeated every inch of the room like maggots within a festering, rotting carcass.

We have already looked at the insertion of capitals. If I were an editor, it would be something that would probably stop me reading this, but if Hawksmoor only wants to self-publish that's less of a problem. What is a problem is the way it muddies the sense. Here, for example, the use of capitals for the odorous Ultimate Vice and Ultimate Abandonment of Redemption makes them sound to me like brands of perfume.

Now, we have our first simile here. Similes tend to add detail and effect to writing not only by highlighting similarities (as you would expect) but also differences. Here, for example, the simile provides the sense of the smell spreading throughout the room, but what else does it tell us? What is being said about the orgy by a comparison to maggots? Is it foreshadowing the imminent death? Capturing Bill's revulsion? This could be quite a clever bit of writing. Unfortunately, again, we have a double description which saps it of force – we don't really need to be told that our notional corpse is festering or rotting – we already know that because it's full of maggots. Certainly we don't need both, which forms a tautology. This loses momentum and makes the writer look inattentive.


It was a Sexy Party. An Orgy.

Oh dear. This is the first punchline of the piece, and it lets the air out. A “sexy party”. Let's just all say that together, as if we were trying to hit the first dramatic height of a narrative. “Sexy Party”. As a title for a Eurovision entry, it rocks. As a revelation, terrible. Sex party, better if cliché, and used elsewhere. More redundancy here – it's a party with lots of people having sex. And it's an orgy. To be honest, I don't feel this is a big reveal. The only thing that has suggested that this is not a roomful of people fucking so far has been the maggot simile. As such, this one-sentence paragraph (a technique best used sparingly) puts the emphasis in the wrong place and does so in an ineffectual manner.


William, called Bill by most of his associates, and Wilhelmina, referred to as Wilma by the majority of her associates, stood on opposite sides of the wide doorway which faced the room at an odd right angle, taking it all in like hounds that had finally come upon an aroma tracked tirelessly across a million endless, empty miles.

The sentence construction here is opaque. Why, the casual reader might ask, is the wide doorway taking it all in like hounds? This lack of clarity once again breaks scene. Once that is sorted out, this paragraph, which should probably have been the reveal the writer muffed in the last paragraph (that the orgiasts were being watched – which is open-ended and makes the reader interested in what happens next – rather than that the orgiasts were doing sex in an orgy, which we already knew and is pretty much what you'd expect at an orgy) subsides under its own weight.

Why is it necessary for us to know that Bill's real name is William, or that Wilma's is Wilhelmina? Is there a message here about their cryptic similarity? Why the weak repetition of "most/the majority of his/her associates". So, some people who know William shorten his name to Bill. Be still my tachycardia. If so, it is not terribly cryptic – just dropped in the introductory passage like a landed fish. As Bill and Wilma are called Bill and Wilma from then on, we can probably assume that the fish, thus landed, gasps its last and falls from the writer's thoughts.

Meanwhile, another simile. The sense of this simile is pretty clear – that they are looking at the scene as if they were hunting dogs who have come upon their quarry. However, the simile itself is prolix to the point of total attenuation. The adverb “finally” is otiose, and once again we have a pair of empty adjectives before the noun. This before we even think about the difficulty of reconciling the idea that the miles are endless, that there are a million of them and that the dogs have come to the end of them.

Sloppy writing like this damages credibility. It makes the reader stop and puzzle out what the writer is trying to say, and in doing so makes the reader stop reading and start parsing. Given that this story does not have much in the way of plotting or character development, more attention needs to be paid to language.


Bill was quite still where he stood,his large brown eyes darting
every few seconds across the mass of copulating people who populated the room . He wore a terrycloth bathrobe of deep, velvet maroon. His bald black head reflected rays of dim sunlight that poured in through the single window that looked down into the room. As he watched, his face crawling with an almost primitive form of revulsion, his right hand inched its way toward the belt of his robe. There was a large black .45 jutting from the tight, belted line of his waist.



Wilma, tall, dark, slender, and as brilliant as a dying star in its final beautiful display of power, leaned against the doorpost with her right arm trailing the impressive curve of her right thigh. She wore a skintight leather bodysuit that sparkled with pins, rings, and hoops.



Bit of description. Lovely. Gives us some more detail on these mystery observers. They're a bit central casting, but never mind. However, repetitive writing is causing problems. Along with our multiple adjectives, we also have multiple relative clauses. The writer doesn't seem to want to know quite when enough information has been given, nor how to structure the information he's giving. As a result we get dangly messes like His bald black head reflected rays of dim sunlight that poured in through the single window that looked down into the room, tacking “that” after “that” like Meccano. I'm not even touching Wilma, tall, dark, slender, and as brilliant as a dying star in its final beautiful display of power - let us say only that it is often considered remiss to describe a character as dark and as bright as an exploding star in the same sentence.

In the next bit, the author gets little Hawksmoor out and gives it a good polish. I may need a drink first.
 
 
Hawksmoor
01:36 / 11.01.06
Aight, Toksik...I’ve tried to leave the whole thing behind, to be a good person, a mature adult about the matter, but obviously, you're a motherfucking baby, a spoiled white brat who is apparently far too used to getting his way in most matters...so, I’ll say this. Get your thumb out of your ass, man. Grow the fuck up, and get the dick outta yer throat. Stop being a whiney pussy and enter the world of Adulthood with the rest of us. Everyone else has let it all go, that is, except for you. Either let it go, or keep ranting on and on about it. Doesn't matter. The more you post after reading this, the more you'll be telling others on this site about yourself. Fucking baby. LOL. What's your real name, bro? I don't think i'll give you mine, as you're probably gonna fantasize over it like any other queer. You're pathetic.

Have a decent day.
 
 
A Haus of Minions
01:46 / 11.01.06
“Another failed attempt, huh Baby?” she said, smiling a bit.

“Another failed attempt, Wilma, you got that right,” Bill said.

His voice was deep,heavy like an ancient, rusting anchor which had seen far too many drops upon the ocean’s craggy, abusive bottom. His voice was calm enough, despite this, but his gaze, a blazing suede lance about the room, was filled with rage, absolute, and unrelenting.


You know what I'm going to say here, don't you? Well, you're wrong. I'm going to start on register. The writer is bouncing between bombastic – Ultimate Abandonment of Redemption, by Harry! - and workaday - “smiling a bit”. The narrative voice is inconsistent, not in the sense of an unreliable narrator but rather a narrator who is prone to wandering off into conversations about sofas.

But all right, you win. Too may pointless adjectives (an ancient anchor will rust, a rusting anchor will be old). A meandering relative clause (which had seen). Pointless qualifiers (His voice was calm enough despite this - despite it being deep and heavy? Why do we need to be told this?). Also, a real lack of attention to language is starting to make some of this borderline hilarious. An anchor which can see. An ocean with an abusive bottom. And, my personal favourite, a blazing suede lance about the room. Ladies, gentleman, please try to picture a blazing suede lance about the room. Does it seem to you absolute and unrelenting? Or floppy and on fire?


“Ok,” Bill said, his legs splaying in a flash as his right hand drew the .45 from his belt. The tie of the robe was unfurled with the force of the draw, and Bill’s robe fell open, revealing a very scrawny, hairless chest and legs that seemed to quiver with malnutrition. “Let’s clean up this appalling goddamn mess, shall we, Wilma?”

There is a point where infelicitous writing ceases to be an impediment to a story and becomes the story itself. That point may have been reached at the abusive bottom, or the blazing suede lance, but hardier souls might find themselves taking a spill at “his legs splaying in a flash”. The unintentional suggestion that he showed everybody little Bill is unlikely to undermine the menace of the blazing suede lance. We also start having problems with logistics here. It is unclear previously where exactly he had his .45 stashed – only that it jutted from the adjective, adjective noun of his waist. It now turns out that it was secured somehow to the belt of his robe. However, securing a holster and pistol, especially a heavy pistol like a .45, would pull the belt of a bathrobe down and out of the loops, unless it was tied very tightly, in which case it would not fall open when he drew it. These questions of reality do not impinge so much in a well-told story. Draw your own conclusions.


“Well,” Wilma said through suddenly clenched, incredibly white teeth, her formally wandering right hand slipping behind her back and into her own belt, which matched her black leather bodysuit, “I rather enjoyed the first few minutes of this Debacle, but now, well, now it’s just become boring and repetitive.”

Poor word use is, again, going to cause the reader to withdraw, and possibly lose respect for the narrative. “Formerly”, not “formally”. I know, I know, if anyone knows words it is our writer, but perhaps words have not been returning calls lately.

There follows a bit more byplay – all a bit Warren Ellis, but not to be spurned for that. If we cared a bit more about Bill and Wilma, the unexpected smile might be affecting. As it is, it's just data, but is at least blissfully free of similes.

Little Hawksmoor is now firmly in hand. The killing can begin.
 
 
Shrug: Butcher Boy
02:10 / 11.01.06
Hawksmoor: Here is a link to The Barbelith Wiki. I suggest you read "Things That get you into Trouble Pretty Quickly" in "The Guide to Barbelith Posting Etiquette" section. Your above post is completely inexcusable. Homophobia, along with Racism or any other form of bigotry will not be tolerated on Barbelith.
 
 
Hawksmoor
02:14 / 11.01.06
You know....let me get a few things straight...first, here n America, when someone says 'about', it might mean a few things. First, is the obvious...what's that about...etc. The 2nd is used a lot like around..example, 'The man looked about the room." Just another way of saying around. The woman in the stroy is dark, but her beauty is comparable to the majesty of a dying star. Get it? An anchor that can see? Ex. "Your car has seen better days." Can the car see? My point. Things like spelling, in the end, don't bother me....and i do appreciate your review. But what does bother me is your attempt at being funny...."I know, I know, if anyone knows words it is our writer, but perhaps words have not been returning calls lately." Ha ha. That's the very reason why i was so stern before, the reason i didn't give a tin shit. But thanks for the critique.
 
 
Hawksmoor
02:15 / 11.01.06
shrug....kindly piss off.


Good day.
 
 
A Haus of Minions
02:16 / 11.01.06
Yes, shrug, damn your abusive bottom! We're trying to examine great art here!
 
 
Life Critic
02:19 / 11.01.06
Aight, Toksik...I’ve tried to leave the whole thing behind, to be a good person, a mature adult about the matter

no you havent, you liar.
as i said in a PM, you cannot leave it.
rmember telling me it was over for you?
oh, thats right.
i mean the last time.
remember me saying i really doubted it?

uh huh.

as i told you pages back, i am quite immature and have no job to go to. its a killer combination that, with my intellect twice the size of yours, is liable to cost you all the insipid and limpid insults you can muster.
and still i wont be bothered by your pathetic attempts to lower my self esteem.

for a writer, you are a poor foe.

but obviously, you're a motherfucking baby, a spoiled white brat who is apparently far too used to getting his way in most matters

are you serious? what about yor assertion in a PM that This is real life, and what i'm telling you is that i refuse to back down if i feel like i am in the right.?

doesnt that rather make you the blackened pot?

Grow the fuck up, and get the dick outta yer throat.

dear god, man.
gay is not bad.
how many times do i have to explain to you that everyone is sniggering behind their screens every time you go for the cockular?

Everyone else has let it all go, that is, except for you. Either let it go, or keep ranting on and on about it.
i'll keep 'ranting', thanks. if its good enough for you, etc.

Doesn't matter. The more you post after reading this, the more you'll be telling others on this site about yourself.

now, that is true. same for you too. the difference is that what i am telling people about myself isnt going to stop them wanting to have a pint with me later.


Fucking baby. LOL. What's your real name, bro? I don't think i'll give you mine, as you're probably gonna fantasize over it like any other queer.

oh sure. there's nothing us queers like to do more than fantasize over names.

You're pathetic.

oh sure.
answer me one thing, though.
who is more pathetic? the pathetic man, or the man who allows himself to be bothered by the pathetic man?
oh, thats right.
you aint bothered.
you dont even look bothered.
 
 
Jack Fear
02:21 / 11.01.06
It's not just the Shrug's opinion, Hawksmoor. Those are The Rules. Those are the Terms of Service. Continued homophobic slurs, continued personal abuse, will get you banned.

If you want to stay, you'd better dial it back—and pronto, Tonto.
 
 
Jack Fear
02:24 / 11.01.06
And toksik: That goes for you, too. I suggest you step away from this thread for a while until you've both had a chance to cool down. Come back no sooner than 9 AM tomorrow. It's after 1:00 AM where you are—for God's sake, go to bed.
 
 
A Haus of Minions
02:26 / 11.01.06
Home stretch now – it seems like there's plenty of ground left to cover, but much of it is pretty basic descriptions of violence – these are, paradoxically, inoffensive, but also not particularly in need of critique – they would sit perfectly well in a novel by Chris Ryan or similar, and do their job perfectly well. Where things do get more complex is where curlicues or baroque touches. For example:

Sweat, now more sour, (for it had been strengthened with Fear, had it not?) flew in a fine mist into the atmosphere of the room like dandelion spores. This gave the room an odd, wispy look.

Of course, the sweat was already sour – see top of page – so why it is more sour, and indeed how Fear (Jack Fear, presumably, or maybe Judge Fear) had managed to make it so very much more sour in such a brief time. The technique used to explain the addition of this flabby datum is known as apostrophe - literally, a turning away. In this case, the narrator turns away from the action to ask us, the readers, a rhetorical question. For no reason whatever. It does not strengthen the narrative, and once again it shows a failure to understand structure – in a scene in which a charmingly odd couple are killing the entire guest list of an orgy, the action is held up for the deployment of a rhetorical device to make us focus on what the sweat smelled like. You may wonder why this should be so important. I may wonder with you.

I mentioned smiling a bit above as an example of incongruous, workaday phrasing. This example, going from the positively epic (for it had been strengthened with Fear, had it not?), to what sounds like copy for a surveyor's report on some net curtains (this gave the room an odd, wispy look). This achieves the state of bathos - generally defined as a sudden transition from the sublime to the ridiculous – but not apparently for any particular reason. Editing usually picks up this sort of thing, but it must be difficult to edit when one believes that there cannot possibly be anything wrong with one's first draft.

More violence, Little Hawksmoor getting a damn good polishing, and then one of those adventurous moments.

All at once, the almost preternatural beauty she’d held moments before fell away like a cheap disguise. In her laughter and glee, her lips became tight and deeply lined, pulling back from her too white teeth in a grimace of inhumanity. Her curved, sexy thighs became thick trunks that set her into the floor like some ancient death machine. Her hair was a black veil that whipped in an arc through the air. Her arms and eyes flew here and there, mowing down twenty adults in sixty seconds.

Again, ladies and gentlemen, imagine being killed by a woman whose eyes and arms fly here and there, each one equipped with a tiny lawnmower. Pretty terrifying, isn't it? It is also probably more likely than being able to shoot, reload and wind a crossbow twenty times (minimum) in sixty seconds, but I imagine that a professor of toxology was most impressed by this section, so stet.

Bill simply fired his weapon over and over again. Only his eyes
betrayed his state of mind.


Well, his eyes and the way he is discharging a high-caliber firearm into people. But mainly the eyes.


The smell of Death was thick and foul in the air.

“All right?” Wilma said to Bill as she lowered her weapon, looking out upon the Death Room and her former targets.


And we're back to the capitals. In this case, it seems Death> will be joining Ultimate Vice, Ultimate Abandonment of Redemption and Ultimate Spider-Man on the perfume counters of our department stores. The Death Room is presumably where one puts the overstock. It's a fragrance for a man.. or a woman. Or a Sexy Party. One danger of these capitals is that they make these words so loud that even the characters can hear them, and start to pick up phrases from the narrator.

“Maybe we will,” Wilma said, still grinning. “I’m getting quite tired of putting these little sex parties together, and not seeing a damned positive result out of all the hard work at the end.”


She turned and walked from the doorway with not another word. The crossbow hung from her belt, and it bumped and bounced on her rather impressive backside as she walked away.

That's a rather elaborate crossbow, lest we forget, on a rather impressive backside. Rather!


From amid the blanket of smoke and death that permeated (more permeation – see top of page) the room, something stirred.



It was a young white woman.



Her dark, long hair was frazzled and stood on end. There were beads of blood and bits of bone and flesh in her hair and on her face and naked body. She breathed like a horse that’d been run and whipped to the absolute edge of physical breakdown.


A double here – an overcomplex simile and a strangely conversational narrator (that'd).


Tilda Harris had been invited to a Sex Party by a couple of maniacs with a mad mad-on against sex and fun, apparently. Her mind was a hurricane of panic, confusion, and terror. Hadn’t the woman who had tried to kill her (and who had in fact managed quite well in killing her partner and everyone else around her, for that matter) named Wilhelmina been her friend and co-worker for the past year? Hadn’t the two of them shared stories, laughs, and tears over the last year? Had the two of them not been damned near best friends?

Ah-hah! Here is plot. It's very lucky that in these situations one's first instinct is to recap all the action that occurred up to this moment, isn't it?


‘Time for thought and rationality, later,’ her mind screamed at her. ‘For now, Escape is the Grand Thought.’

And that one's second instinct is to do one's best to impersonate Namor, the Sub-Mariner. Hawksmoor seems to believe that criticism of this line is based around the idea that people are not lucid when under the threat of death. I would suggest it is rather that most people are not Prince Valiant when in such dire peril. Again, the tone of the narration has infected the characters. And yes, of course this is entirely intentional. It is not, however, good writing. It is, rather, the sort of thing that makes readers think that a writer cannot do characterisation.

There was a sudden Whisper upon the air, and Tilda Harris was thrown backward as an arrow drove itself through her throat and out the back of her neck> Tilda was thrown back into the final place of pleasure for twenty people, who had seen only happiness and good vibes in their immediate futures.

And so farewell, Tilda Harris. We hardly knew you. In fact, we didn't know you at all. You were thrown in at the end to generate a little extra pathos and provide a reason for a bit more guignol and another cracking mixed metaphor. Again, there's not much to say about this passage - it's fine for what it does.


And she followed Bill, even as he seethed with rage (and she thought of the best, most articulate way to invite her friend Trudy Wilson to a coke and acid party that she and Bill had been planning for some months) to whatever immediate destination Fate would lead them to next.


Again, we've got this problem of emphasis. The writer could have ended on an action sequence, with the death of Tilda Harris, but he wants to leave us with the knowledge that our heroes will do this again in the near future. That's a noble aspiration, but in fact is not achieved – after telling us this, the ending itself is a pointless, redundant meander - to whatever immediate destination Fate would lead them to next. It's a damp squib. If I were suggesting to the great man how to end this bloody blancmange, I might suggest a bit of direct speech in which Wilma chats about the possibility of another party as they quit the scene, but of course I would never presume so to do. Little Hawksmoor has spat its creamy venom, and we may finally rest.
 
 
Ex
12:25 / 11.01.06
Hawksmoor, Shrug is trying ot be helpful. If you persist with the homophobic nonsense, you could have your account closed. Surely a writer can insult someone without bigotry, which is, frankly, an excuse to use cliche?

Although, that said thanks for this completely mystifying top tip:

I don't think i'll give you mine, as you're probably gonna fantasize over it like any other queer.

When my subscription to Suicide Girls expires I'll be straight out there flicking through the telephone directory.
 
 
Fly Beezy (War Minister)
(prev. Y SO ALT?)
12:32 / 11.01.06
Having actually read the story now, it bears a rather striking resemblance to the works of one 'Dan Mann'.
 
 
Fly Beezy (War Minister)
(prev. Y SO ALT?)
12:36 / 11.01.06
Ex - one possible explanation for this is that Hawksmoor is actually a public figure who is also an established figure of homosexual desire. A homophobic gay icon, essentially. Slim? Fiddy? Who can say?
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
13:30 / 11.01.06
This thread is marvelous.

Well worth my time and energy.
 
 
DRR... DRR... DRR...
13:34 / 11.01.06
You mean marvelos LOL.
 
 
Fly Beezy (War Minister)
(prev. Y SO ALT?)
14:11 / 11.01.06
Yes Gyspy: this actually turned out pretty cool after all.
 
 
Ex
14:42 / 11.01.06
an established figure of homosexual desire

Yes, true - he may already have experience of having his sixpack the reluctant participant in a million homoerotic sexual fantasies, while he was just trying to play his music for the kids.

That would explain the unshakeable, unwarranted self-confidence and the homophobic slurs (otherwise such an unusual combination).
 
 
Hawksmoor
16:59 / 11.01.06
Thank you..you're all wonderful folks. Heh.
 
 
eddie thirteen
23:21 / 11.01.06
Huh huh...uh...Shut up, Beavis.

He isn't Dan Mann, either. Dan Mann was also a homophobe and an asshole, but he was literate, and sometimes funny. This guy is worthless on every level.
 
 
Hawksmoor
23:59 / 11.01.06
Eddie...hey, guy. When did you join the party? Join the dog pile. You must be gay, also. Otherwise, why would you get offended so easily? It's okay, man. Not okay that yer gay (unnatural and wrong) but okay that you have such low self esteem that you have to make yerself feel better by jumping on the bandwagon when there are already dozens upon it. It's okay. I can certainly take it. No problem. If it floats yer boat and makes you feeeeeel better, well, eh, what can i say? LOL. As far as having good self esteem and unwarrented self worth, as you've said, sue me for feeling good about myself, bro. Sue me for being a man who is disgusted by gays, ignorant white folks, and their PC views of themselvbes and society. Heh..you shut up, Butt-Head. You people are classic.
 
 
A Haus of Minions
23:59 / 11.01.06
I notice he hasn't managed to come back on toksik. Possibly he has never thought that somebody he is calling gay might actually not be offended at being called gay, only at the assumption that being called gay is something to be offended at. This only leaves him with the word "pathetic", which I expect to get a bit of a thrashing...
 
 
Hawksmoor
00:10 / 12.01.06
"Possibly he has never thought that somebody he is calling gay might actually not be offended at being called gay, only at the assumption that being called gay is something to be offended at." Makes no sense at all. Bottom line, if you aren't something and someone calls you that, or assumes you're something, especially something like homosexual, well, why be offended at all by it? If anyone were to call me such, i wouldn't give a tin shit. Let the people it affects be offended by it, smart guy. What you've stated makes about as much sense as anything else you said up to this point. So, please, stop trying to sound abstract and intelligent. It just comes off as New Age, unrealistic psychobabble. What an idiot. Oh, and if u are into dudes, if you're also a dude, or vie versa, no matter how PC you are, being offended, for the record, it should be something that warrents pretty big shame. I'd think so. Not natural, simple as that. But then, what do i know? i'm just one more ignorant Southern Boy, eh? So, go on, be offended, closet case. LOL.
 
 
Hawksmoor
00:12 / 12.01.06
Vice veras, i meant, for all you anal, Literate people. My bad. LOL.
 
 
A Haus of Minions
00:12 / 12.01.06
Toksik said he was bisexual, illiterate. Try to keep up.
 
 
Hawksmoor
00:13 / 12.01.06
Whoops, i meant Vice Versa.
 
 
A Haus of Minions
00:16 / 12.01.06
Vice versa.
 
 
Hawksmoor
00:18 / 12.01.06
Illiterate. Who, big words, smart man. Try not to sound too smart, bro. toksik's in denial. No such thing as bisexual. Either you're gay, or you aren't. Self deception can be such a wonderful thing, though, can't it? What a freak show this is. You people are self deluded, a lot of you. No wonder so many of you are so easily offended. This site must be full of fags, LOL. I'm so sorry, not bundles of sticks, but homosexuals. Your points are tired and useless. Give it up. Well, I don't suppose it matters much, anyway. People who like doo doo diving are crazy, anyway. As I am sure most of you can attest to.
 
 
DRR... DRR... DRR...
00:20 / 12.01.06
Hawksmoor old chap, if you really believe that being gay is "unnatural" as you put it, you are so on the wrong board. Barbelith as a community is opposed to bigotry and you, kitten, are expressing some deeply bigoted veiws in a very unpleasant manner. You either need to a) buck your ideas up sharpish or b) at least shut the fuck up about how dudes being into dudes is unnatural LOL. Holding repellant veiws is not a banning offence; continually spewing hatespeech like Gary Bushell in a woodchipper is.

It may not happen overnight but if you keep this up, your suit will be killed and you will be unable to post on the board anymore, simple as that. Just so's we're clear.
 
 
Hawksmoor
00:23 / 12.01.06
I think I’ll go spend my time someplace else, as so many of you are so incredibly self deluded and stubborn. It doesn't do a body good to spend so much time in the company of Pseudo-Intellectual queers and pillow biters. Good day to you all. This has been pretty fun, though. Catch you all on the flip side. By the way (my childish giggling is pretty loud, now, can you hear it, folks?)I think I’m gonna take the posts I’ve put on off. Hey, if they cannot be appreciated for what they are, good or bad, well, no need for them to be up here at all, is there? All in good fun, though. LOL. Oh, and I got the last word. Hehhe..shaddup, Bevis.
 
 
A Haus of Minions
00:27 / 12.01.06
I suggest that moderators don't agree deletions to the homophobe's posts. I'm happy to see these threads locked and deleted, but he doesn't get to tear chunks out of the thread on a whim.
 
 
Life Critic
01:07 / 12.01.06
*sets ganesh's watch*
 
 
Keith, like a scientist
02:38 / 12.01.06
It's really a shame, but also quite telling, that your last word is Beavis, and that it isn't even spelled correctly. Ahem.
 
 
Life Critic
03:05 / 12.01.06
I know words if i know anything, man. Trust me on that much.

as stoatie points out elsewhere, its all about the 'if'.
 
 
eddie thirteen
03:11 / 12.01.06
Was that peckerwood just talking to me?
 
  

Page: 123(4)5

 
  
Add Your Reply